Case Summary

The Stake.us lawsuitKillham v. Sweepsteaks Limited, Adin Ross, and Aubrey Drake Graham, Case No. 4:25-cv-00990-DGK — is a class action case pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri. It alleges that Stake.us, which markets itself as a harmless “social gaming” platform, is in fact an illegal online casino that has extracted real money from Missouri residents while hiding behind sweepstakes labeling. The case names three defendants: the Cyprus-based operator of the site, and two celebrities — streaming personality Adin Ross and recording artist Drake — who are alleged to have promoted the platform to millions of followers without adequate disclosure.

What Is the Stake.us Lawsuit?

The Stake.us lawsuit was originally filed in October 2025 in Jackson County Circuit Court. Defendant Sweepsteaks Limited — the Cyprus-registered company that operates Stake.us from Australia — removed the case to federal court in December 2025. It is now before Judge David G. Kays in the Western District of Missouri.

At its core, the case presents a straightforward argument: Stake.us is an online casino. The “sweepstakes” label it uses is a legal fiction designed to allow the platform to operate in states like Missouri where real-money online gambling is not authorized. The lawsuit contends that the platform’s mechanics — the way money flows in, the way prizes flow out, and the house advantage built into every game — are functionally indistinguishable from illegal gambling under Missouri law, regardless of what the company calls it.

The complaint brings claims against not just the operator, but two of its most prominent promoters: Adin Ross and Drake, whose massive social media and streaming audiences made them valuable partners in extending the platform’s reach into states across the country.

How Stake.us Works — and Why the Lawsuit Calls It Gambling

Stake.us offers a library of casino-style games — slots, table games, live dealer formats — that should be immediately familiar to anyone who has visited a traditional casino or gambling site. The platform uses a two-currency system:

  • Gold Coins — presented as a free entertainment currency with no redemption value
  • Stake Cash — a currency that can be redeemed for real prizes, including cash equivalents

The platform insists users never have to pay to play because Gold Coins can theoretically be obtained for free. In practice, the lawsuit alleges, meaningful participation requires purchasing Gold Coin packages — which come bundled with Stake Cash bonuses. The real prize currency, in other words, is only practically accessible by spending real money.

Missouri law defines gambling in terms of what is actually happening, not what a company chooses to call it. The complaint argues that the costs required to participate meaningfully, the built-in house advantage, and the Stake Cash redemption structure together constitute gambling as a matter of law — making every dollar lost on the platform a potentially recoverable loss under Missouri’s gambling loss recovery statute, R.S.Mo. § 434.030.

The Role of Drake and Adin Ross

Drake and Adin Ross are not peripheral figures in this lawsuit — they are named defendants. The complaint’s theory is that the Stake.us enterprise required not just a platform, but a distribution network: celebrity promoters with the reach to direct millions of followers to a site they could not otherwise advertise through conventional channels.

Adin Ross, one of the most-followed streamers on Twitch and Kick, has promoted Stake.us extensively to a predominantly young audience. Drake, one of the best-selling musicians of all time, has similarly used his social platforms to direct fans to the site. The lawsuit alleges that both celebrities received compensation for these promotions without adequately disclosing the paid nature of their endorsements — a potential violation of FTC disclosure requirements layered on top of the underlying gambling law claims.

The complaint asserts three causes of action, each of which reflects a distinct legal theory for recovery:

  • Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (R.S.Mo. § 407.020): Missouri’s primary consumer protection statute prohibits deceptive and unfair business practices in connection with the sale of goods or services. The complaint alleges that Stake.us’s marketing of its platform as free social gaming while extracting real money through coin purchases constitutes an unlawful practice under the MMPA.
  • Unjust Enrichment: This claim does not require proof of deception — it simply asks whether it would be unjust for the defendants to keep the money they received. Given the alleged illegal nature of the gambling activity, the complaint argues the answer is yes.
  • Missouri Gambling Loss Recovery (R.S.Mo. § 434.030): This statute is a powerful and often overlooked tool in Missouri litigation. It expressly authorizes a person who has lost money gambling to bring a civil action to recover those losses. If the platform constitutes gambling — as the complaint alleges — this statute provides a direct avenue for class members to get their money back.

For more on how Missouri’s consumer protection laws work in practice, see the Missouri Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division.

Carey & Danis LLC has extensive experience litigating online gambling and consumer fraud class actions. See all of our active class action investigations.

Who May Be Eligible to Join the Stake.us Lawsuit?

The proposed class is defined to include Missouri residents who used Stake.us and lost money on the platform. Based on the complaint, you may have a claim if:

  • You were a Missouri resident at the time you used Stake.us
  • You purchased Gold Coins or otherwise spent real money on the platform
  • You lost money in the process — whether through direct losses on games or through the decline in value of Stake Cash relative to your purchases

You do not need to have been a heavy user of the platform. Even a single purchase that resulted in a loss may qualify. If you are unsure whether your experience meets the criteria, the best step is to contact us for a free evaluation.

⚠️ Time Limits — Act Before the Deadline

Missouri Statute of Limitations Warning: Legal claims have strict filing deadlines called statutes of limitations. Missouri’s consumer protection and fraud claims are subject to a five-year limitations period, while some related claims may be shorter. If you used Stake.us and lost money, waiting to act could mean losing your right to recover entirely. Do not wait — contact Carey & Danis LLC today for a free case review. Statutes of limitations vary depending on your specific facts; an attorney can advise you on your individual deadline.

Frequently Asked Questions About the Stake.us Lawsuit

What is the Stake.us lawsuit about?
The Stake.us lawsuit — Killham v. Sweepsteaks Limited, Adin Ross, and Aubrey Drake Graham, Case No. 4:25-cv-00990-DGK — is a class action pending in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri. It alleges that Stake.us operates as an illegal online casino disguised as a sweepstakes gaming platform and that Missouri residents who lost money on the site are entitled to recover those losses.
Is Stake.us legal?
The lawsuit alleges that Stake.us is not legal in Missouri. While the platform markets itself as free social gaming, the complaint argues its actual mechanics — real-money coin purchases, casino-style games with a built-in house edge, and Stake Cash redemptions — constitute gambling under Missouri law regardless of the “sweepstakes” label.
Why are Drake and Adin Ross defendants in a gambling lawsuit?
Both celebrities promoted Stake.us to millions of followers. The lawsuit alleges they received compensation for these endorsements without adequately disclosing the paid nature of their promotions and that they actively directed audiences to what the complaint characterizes as an illegal gambling platform.
How does Stake.us make money if it’s free to play?
Stake.us uses a dual-currency system. Gold Coins are the free entertainment currency, but Stake Cash — the currency redeemable for real prizes — is primarily obtained by purchasing Gold Coin packages. The lawsuit alleges that the practical path to meaningful play requires real money and that the platform’s house edge ensures it profits from the majority of user activity.
How do I know if I qualify for the Stake.us class action?
You may qualify if you are a Missouri resident who used Stake.us, spent real money on the platform including Gold Coin purchases, and experienced losses. Contact Carey & Danis LLC for a free, confidential evaluation — our attorneys will review your situation at no cost and no obligation.
How much does it cost to join the lawsuit?
Nothing out of pocket. Carey & Danis LLC handles class action cases on a contingency fee basis — you pay no legal fees unless we recover money on your behalf. Your initial consultation is completely free and confidential.

Free Case Evaluation — No Fee Unless We Win

Missouri residents who used Stake.us may be entitled to recover their losses. Tell us about your situation — a member of our team will follow up promptly. Your information is confidential and there is no obligation.